RSS

Category Archives: Theatre Review

Theatre Review – “The Best Man” @ Gerald Schoenfeld Theatre, 3/31/12

By: Dan Mason @djdan1079

Tensions are high as two political candidates arrive at their party’s nominating convention in Philadelphia. On one hand, you have a millionaire, whose critics claim is “out of touch” with the needs of average American. On the other side, a Senator who worked his way up from the farmland and allows his deep religious beliefs to guide his vision for the country. It sounds like it could be plucked out of today’s headlines, but Gore Vidal’s The Best Man was written in 1960. Some 50 years later, the show feels as relevant as ever at the Schoenfeld Theatre.

Led by an all-star ensemble of actors, the play examines the behind the scenes maneuvering of the election cycle, and asks if men choose to corrupt themselves in a quest for power? Or whether that desire for power is what makes them corrupt in the first place?

John Larroquette, an Emmy winner for his work on Night Court, and a Tony Winner for last season’s performance in How to Succeed, plays Secretary William Russell, a former member of President Artie Hockstader’s cabinet, and the current frontrunner for his party’s nomination. Russell is not without flaws. His womanizing and affairs are no secret to those around him, including his wife Alice (a wonderfully deadpan Candace Bergen). Yet, he also serves as the moral compass of the show. When his competitor begins the mud slinging and uses Russell’s prior mental health issues as a negative attack, Russell is forced to decide whether he should retaliate and go negative as well.

It’s a tactic that isn’t just encouraged by his campaign manager (a lost in the shuffle Michael McKeon), but by former President Hockstader himself. James Earl Jones plays the former Commander-In-Chief, in what is one of the more puzzling casting decisions in recent memory. The play is set in 1960, which means that the audience is to believe that America had an African-American president in the 1950′s, some ten years before the assasination of MLK, and three years before the Civil Rights March in Washington. I’m all for color blind casting in almost every instance, but it’s just hard to suspend one’s disbelief to the point of ignoring a significant part of our country’s history.

ImageTo Jones’ credit, you do forget about this point during the second act, because he’s putting on a master class in acting technique. Hockstader is rapidly deteriorating, but is motivated to play the game one last time, encouraging a little political backbiting and offering his endorsement to the man who can play the game the best. At 81 years old, it’s reasonable to expect to see him stumble over the occasional line, but Jones makes it look like an acting choice. His scenes with Larroquette, in particular are a joy to watch.

Erik McCormick of Will & Grace plays the slick, ambitious, Senator Joseph Cantwell. While the devout, religious beliefs of his character call to mind Rick Santorum, the down home, southern charm and devious smile make him feel more like John Edwards. McCormick lacked the gravitas needed to feel like a serious Presidential candidate during the first act, but he fared better as the show progressed and plays the desperate, win by any means nature of Cantwell extremely well. As Cantwell’s wife, Mabel, musical theatre veteran Kerry Butler (Hairspray, Xanadu, Catch Me If You Can) feels a little too over the top, even for a role that calls for an actress to play it big.

Oh, and there is an up and comer named Angela Lansbury in the show as well. Playing the role of the Women’s Division chair, Sue Ellen Gamadge, Lansbury’s time onstage is limited to about four scenes, but she commands the stage, nails her jokes, and left to applause at every exit she made.

Larroquette might not be the biggest commercial name in the program, but make no mistake this is his show. His character might be a philanderer, and might have a history of mental illness, but yet you admire him because he’s a good person. His Senator Russell often says “may the best man win”, but Larroquette is the best man on this stage, which is high praise given the talent involved. I can’t imagine that he isn’t in line for another Tony nomination this year.

For a three act show, director Michael Wilson (The Orphans’ Home Cycle) keeps the action zipping along at a brisk pace. The show runs at about 2 hours and 40 minutes, including two intermissions. The set design by Derek McLane is superb.

The Best Man is a limited, 18-week, engagement. The matinee I attended appeared to be a sellout. Get your tickets while you can.

Grade: A-

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 04/01/2012 in Broadway, Theatre Review

 

Tags: , ,

Theatre Review: “Beauty and the Beast” @ Broadway San Jose, 03/06/12

Written by: Garrett Biggs

After a successful trip to San Francisco in 2010, the touring production of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast returned to the Bay Area courtesy of Broadway San Jose. This particular production achieves exactly what it aims to do, which is recreate the magic of the Disney movie, on stage.

Needless to say, Beauty and the Beast is the perfect show to bring the entire family to, and from what I saw, audiences of all ages found something to enjoy here.
From the opening of the show, you see just how “big” this show is going to be. The set is massive and intricate, giving a truly storybook feel to it. In the prologue to the show, you get a quick look at some master puppetry, as well as some of the best lighting I have seen in a touring production. It then transitions seamlessly into the classic opening “Belle” where we get a taste of how true to the movie this is.

Beauty and the Beast doesn’t just stay true to the music and the dialogue though, but the feel of the show as well. The credit for this lies probably with the casting directors, who found the perfect fit for almost every single role in the musical.

Each actor in this show lives up to the potential of their character, which is difficult to do when every single person in the audience knows and loves the characters already. Logan Denninghoff is absolutely perfect for the role of Gaston, and it feels as if he’s been ripped right out of the movie and thrown on stage. He delivered every single line hilariously and was probably the true star of the show. The number “Gaston” is one of the most exciting parts of the show with probably the best and most accessible choreography you’ll see.

Dane Agostinis as Beast and Emily Behny as Belle. Photo by Joan Marcus.

Dane Agostinis (Beast) shines, but in a different way than you would think. He doesn’t stick to the classic Beast, like Denninghoff does to Gaston. Instead, I suppose you would refer to him as more of a “bro-like” Beast. Some of the scenes in the second act when Lumiere and Cogsworth are helping him woo Belle are wonderful as he is acting like nothing short of a bro. Agostinis took the role as far as he could, but not so far it made you feel uncomfortable. The children seemed to enjoy him the most of any of the actors.

My personal favorite though was Jen Bechter (Madame de la Grande Bouche) who left me falling out of my seat in laughter, in a featured role at best. She was just another example of the cast living up to their potential as a whole.

One of my few complaints with the show was the staging. It was obvious to see what they were doing: It was supposed to be as big and eye grabbing as possible. That probably worked brilliantly with little kids. For me though, it was simply annoying and by no means aesthetically pleasing.

Also—Does Lefou need to roll onto the stage literally every single time he made an appearance? It’s fun once or twice to see that, but he rolled almost every single time. The directors attempted at physical humor all throughout the show between Gaston and Lefou, yet it was nothing but awkward. It looked horribly unrealistic. Yes, it’s supposed to be exaggerated, but not that much.

Beauty and the Beast also gets major respect from me for some of the “smaller” technical aspects they used. Maurices’ invention at the start of the show is a beautiful technical contraption that had me turning to my friend asking if he was really driving that thing. There were also the confetti cannons that were used at the end of “Be Our Guest”, which came from both the top and the sides of the theater.

“Be Our Guest” is brilliant and lives up to the movie 100%. The set changes completely, but it is seamless and exciting. This song defines the entire show: big, flashy, fun and classic Disney. Kids love it, adults love it, it is just why this is the perfect family show.

Beauty and the Beast isn’t going to change your life, but does everything you want it to. It stays true to the show, but has enough changes to keep you interested throughout.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

5 Reasons to Buy a Ticket to See the Revival of “Godspell” on Broadway

One of my favorite experiences in the theatre is walking into a show and being completely swept away by the production. This is exactly what happened when I saw latest revival of Godspell on February, 16th, 2012. I wasn’t really a fan of this show before I walked in the door, but as I walked out, I became a fan for life.

Here are the five reasons you should buy tickets to see Godspell:

5. Intimate Theatre Experience – With the Gershwin Theatre next door, (the highest seating capacity of any Broadway theatre, with 1,933 seats), Godspell is housed in one of the most intimate theatres on Broadway: The Circle in the Square Theatre. There’s not a bad seat in the house and it’s such a interesting atmosphere with the band situated around the entire house. I don’t know how much I would love that being the musical director, but it did give a fun feel to the overall show. You really feel like you are a part of the company and it allows the audience to be emotionally invested in the piece at a quicker pace than other times I’ve seen this show.

4. Lighting Design - The lighting design by David Weiner was incredible. It was absolutely stunning throughout the entire show, especially during the crucifixion scene.

You can see some of the design in this preview video below:

3. The Cast/Updated Book -  The night I saw it, I saw two understudies in the show: Hannah Elless (Broadway debut that evening), and Corey Mach. While, they were still finding their groove, the entire audience knew they were having fun, especially when Hunter Parrish came on with his big goofy grin. And Morgan Jame’s “Turn Back O Man” was absolutely fantastic! God that girl can belt!

The updated and fresh book gave the feeling that the show wasn’t dated at all. Throughout the entire night they were continually cracking jokes about current social and political topics. The direction, by Daniel Goldstein, was very thoughtful, fun, inventive and created a real community feel. (I loved all of the special effects that were added like the trampolines, Jesus walking on water and the beautiful crucifixion scene which I’ve already mentioned.) The improvisation in the show was extremely witty and super funny. The night we saw it Paul Shaffer (the band director of Late Night with David Letterman) was a guest star at the beginning of Act 2. He sang the original version of “Learn Your Lessons Well”. What a special opportunity and a complete surprise for us in the audience! Afterwards, there was an awesome talk-back that we could ask Paul questions and learn more about the start of Godspell back in 1970.

Overall, it was one of those “special” nights on Broadway where we saw something that will never be recreated.

2. The Updated Score - What a beautiful score! The new arrangements (especially the vocal arrangements) were stunning.

Listen to a few tracks here:

“Prepare Ye”


“All Good Gifts”


“Turn Back O Man”


1. Hunter Parrish’s – “Beautiful City”

This particular version of this song spoke to me. I can’t stop listening to this track. Get your tickets to hear this as soon as possible — word on the street is that Hunter might be leaving the cast this Spring.

Get tickets here.

 
 

Tags: , , ,

Theatre Review: “Carrie” @ Lucille Lortel Theatre, 02/18/12

I can’t even begin to tell you how exciting this new production of Carrie is. Frankly, I was only going because of my morbid sense of curiosity. I wanted to see what MCC Theatre could do with this infamous flop of a musical and guess what: they nailed it.

First off, the story is heart-wrenching. I was expecting this silly horror-infused story, that was full of camp and completely affected, but it was the exact opposite. It pulled at my heart strings in ways I wasn’t expecting. The book by Lawrence D. Cohen, based on Stephen King’s novel, focuses in on Carrie’s tormentors and the horrifying bullying that happens at school everyday. It’s completely heart-breaking.

I was pulled in instantly with the first song, “In” sung by all of the students. The teenage angst was comparable to “Totally F*cked” and “Bitch of a Living” in Spring Awakening, and just as amazing. The vocal arrangements by Mary-Mitchell Campbell were fantastic (especially in this song). The choreography by Matt Williams was just as interesting and angst-ridden.

Then, we are given insight to Carrie’s (Molly Ranson) thoughts when she sings, “And the world will open its eyes and for once the whole world will recognize, Carrie…” in the title song, “Carrie”. The audience discovers that she knows she’s a little different from her peers, but the only thing she wants is to be normal and accepted, something that everyone can empathize with.

CARRIE marquee at the Lucille Lortel Theatre

The story is narrated (very infrequently, but always at the right times) by Sue Snell (Christy Altomare) who is the only survivor from the prom nightmare. Sue wanted to help Carrie and stop the bullying so she gets her boyfriend, Tommy Ross (Derek Klena) to ask her to the prom instead of taking Sue. Tommy has a soft heart and agrees to do it because he’s in love with Sue. Their duet, “You Shine” at the beginning of Act 2 was fantastic.

Of course, you can’t forget how Carrie’s mother, Margaret White, (Marin Mazzie) fits into all of this. Carrie goes home after the “locker room incident” and tries to tell her mother what had happened, but instead she banishes Carrie to her room and basically tells her to get the devil out of her. Mazzie’s intensity was unbelievable. The levels of emotion that Mazzie goes through during the show is indescribable. White’s character has been hurt by men, but confused by religion, and is so afraid that she shelters and manipulates her daughter so much that she’s one of the reasons that Carrie has been tortured so much at school. Yet, Margaret foresees the potential nightmare at the school prom and forbids Carrie to go, but Carrie is finding a new found independence and self-worth so she decides to go to the prom anyway. Mazzie sings a heart-wrenching ballad, “When There’s No One” after Carrie leaves for the prom. (I couldn’t help but think of Mazzie singing, “I Miss the Mountains” in Next to Normal.) Mazzie is pure genius and weirdly enough, (because she isn’t in a lot of the show) she’s the glue that holds the whole production together.

All of the main and supporting characters were amazing, including the bitchy Chris Hargensen (Jeanna De Waal) and her loser boyfriend, Billy Nolan (Ben Thompson) both from the recently closed, American Idiot. Carmen Cusack, as the high school PE teacher, Miss Lynn Gardner, brought such a caring and compassionate element to the show. Her lovely duet with Carrie, “Unsuspecting Hearts”, was beautiful, especially when it was reprised at the prom with Carrie standing in her beautiful pink gown.

The set, brilliantly designed by David Zinn, was very basic. With simple use of projections, it morphed into a classroom, to Carrie’s gothic-like home, to the locker room and then of course, the gym where the prom took place. Of course, I can’t forget the lighting design by Kevin Adams. You can tell that both of these elements were perfectly crafted together, because they were almost one-in-the-same. Now, if the show was to transfer to Broadway, then I would expect a completely different set, but for this particular space, it was perfect.

The main thing that blew my mind was the sound design by Jonathan Deans and vocal design by AnnMarie Milazzo. I don’t want to give too much away, but when the pig’s blood dropped at the prom the sound in that theatre was incredible. I’ve never experienced anything like that at live theatre before. It was thrilling. My senses were overloaded and the effect was chilling. (I get goose-bumps even thinking about it.) It was more effective than any amount of real blood that they could have used. I wish I could see it again, because I was so blown away by the sound effects that I almost couldn’t focus on what was happening (which was probably the point) because that’s when Carrie snapped and set fire to the gym. Again, it blew my mind.

I’m completely hooked; I’m Carrie’s biggest fan!

 
 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Theatre Review: “Bring it On” @ Orpheum Theatre, SF, 12/14/11

With a combined creative team that brought us some of the best musical theatre in the last decade – Next to Normal, In the Heights,  and Avenue Q - you might think Bring it On would end up being another amazing musical theatre masterpiece, but unfortunately this hot mess is nothing but an uninspired mess. It’s like Glee after the second episode. The story meanders but doesn’t give an real insight into any of the characters (I don’t even remember any of their names), the unmelodic music is a mash-up of In the Heights throwaways and through-composed whiny Next to Normal bits and the choreography looks like In the Heights, and yet tries to be something you would see on “America’s Best Dance Crew” but doesn’t even land close to either.

Nothing works, except for the real cheerleaders that are in the production. They fly to new heights, quite literally and amazingly. And because of this, Bring it On ended with huge cheers from cheerleaders (young and old) in the audience when they leapt to their feet and gave it a standing ovation.

Finally, someone put their life on the stage.

I sat there annoyed and felt cheated that some of my musical theatre idols delivered a sugar-coated passionless production of a movie musical that isn’t really based on the movie (except the subject manner). It is, after-all, only “inspired” by the original movie, written by Jessica Bendinger. Can we say, false advertising?

Maybe my expectations were high, but come on, Tom Kitt (Next to Normal) and Lin-Manuel Miranda (In the Heights) wrote the music and Jeff Whitty (Avenue Q) wrote the book and they have all won Tony Awards for their previous works on Broadway. This should have been the musical theatre “dream team”. Yet, the style was disjunct and the music is split between Miranda’s signature rapping (which didn’t work into this production at all, especially when the white girls are rapping at the beginning of Act 1) and Kitt’s (usually) brilliantly through-composed compositions. I left not being able to remember a single melody. The only few good songs in the show were the ones that were pre-recorded: “Legendary”, “Don’t Drop” and “Cross the Line”. And those are not even close to anything I would listen to on my iPod.

Opening Night at "Bring it On" - photo by SHNSF

Then, there’s the other pre-recorded tracks. To be honest, the whole show was mostly tracked. They left a few songs, mostly in the second act, that aren’t pre-recorded, I guess, to give the musicians in the pit something to do. There’s even pre-recorded singers on these tracks. Are we serious? With a cast of 30, you’d think you wouldn’t need to pre-record singers, but you do when it sounds like there are only 10 people singing on stage during the big group numbers.

The vocal stylizations by Taylor Louderman (Campbell), a character fashioned after Elle Woods but without any of the charisma or charm, was so bright that is was borderline screaming at points. She could obviously belt notes that most girls only dream of, but song after song sung in these high belts were absolutely obnoxious. I don’t fault her because she had nothing to work with. Even her character’s arc was uninteresting. She does her damnest to carry the show, but it’s hard when the material you are given is spiritless.

One of Campbell’s best bits in the show, is when she shows up to the dance crew in her new high school’s mascot: the leprechaun. She dances the hell out of it and gets the girls on the dance crew to be her friend because she dances so well. But the best part is that Louderman isn’t the one wearing the leprechaun costume, it’s another cast member (supposedly unbeknownst to the audience), so she doesn’t even know the dance. Totally unfortunate.

The best part of the show was the “chubby” sidekick, Ryann Redmond (Bridget). She’s the only one that kept landing her lines and bits consistently throughout the night. While, there were a few good oneliners in the show (“I got google. Bitch.” and “No cheerleading squad? What’s the point of school?”), Redmond was the only character that felt fresh and new. The rest of the characters were a colliding mess of Legally Blonde, In the Heights and Next to Normal. (Three really awkward shows to put together.) And, of course, none of it fit.

"Bring it On" cast during opening night bows - photo by SHNSF

The set design (David Korins) and lighting design (Jason Lyons) were pretty spectacular. The set used four different LCD screens that moved around the stage extremely well and created some very cool stage pictures. It was unlike anything I have seen. And the lighting was perfectly amped up for all of the big production numbers. Overall, both elements were extremely impressive.

The producers were right not to transfer this to Broadway. Besides, the huge overhead that it would cost to run nightly on Broadway and the fact that the musician’s union would probably boycott the show since everything is pre-recorded, the critics would rip it to shreds in New York City. Instead, Bring it On will bring cheer and happiness to cheerleaders all around the country. People will go, enjoy themselves, laugh at the silly jokes, and walk away entertained. But, Bring it On will never land in the same category as Wicked which is the very demographic they are trying to sell this show to.

And the show will not even be readily produced on the regional/community/high school musical theatre circuit because of the cast demands, technical difficulty and pre-recorded tracks. There’s not even life after this national tour for this show.

The creative team had the opportunity to mold pop music, cheerleading and musical theatre together all into one amazing package, but instead it was just a big tug-of-war and no one won. Instead, it just ended up being a unenthusiastic mess that the creator’s worked on to pass the time, waiting until their next stroke of genius will come. And God, I hope it’s soon, for everyone’s sake.

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Thoughts on “Lysistrata Jones” Preview @ The Walter Kerr Theatre, 11/21/11

Michael Riedel has written at length about the recent scramble by Broadway producers to find open theatres for their new shows. As many as a dozen productions are looking for a home on the “Great White Way”. Even some of the big names were almost left out in the cold, as the new vehicle for Broadway heavyweights Matthew Broderick and Kathleen Marshall, Nice Work If You Can Get It, looked like it might be in trouble until Funny Girl fell by the wayside last month, leaving an opening at the Imperial.

However, I’m here to deliver a bit of good news for those other producers, who are undoubtedly biting their fingernails…. The Walter Kerr Theatre should be open by Christmas!

Lysistrata Jones, the new musical from Douglas Carter Beane (Sister Act, Xanadu, The Little Dog Laughed), is the season’s early front-runner for the “Glory Days Memorial Trophy” for the shortest run in Broadway history. An updated retelling of the Greek comedy, Lysistrata, the show centers around the plight of the Athens University basketball team, who hasn’t won a game in 30 years. A perky cheerleader and revolutionary named Lysistrata Jones tries to change their fortune by convincing the rest of her squad to not “give it up” until the boys wins a game. The show had a well received tryout at the 100 seat Judson Memorial Church in Washington Square that was successful enough to convince producers to transfer to Broadway.

And oh, where do I even start with this…

First of all, the press release for the show promises that Lysistrata Jones “takes student activism to a whole new level”. Herein lies the first problem. In an age of the “Occupy” movement, where young people are getting pepper sprayed in the face for protesting a hierarchy of power that they feel is oppressive to the “99 percent”, it feels a little shallow to sit through a two-and-a-half hour musical about college athletics, packaged as a tale about “activism”. Of course, the production team cannot be blamed over the current political landscape. It’s more an issue of “the wrong show at the wrong time”. However, there are numerous other problems that do fall on their shoulders.

Case in point, it’s completely unclear to me as to when this show is really taking place. I mean, I walked into a curtain with an Athens University logo that read “411 B.C.”.  Yet, all of the students are carrying Macbooks, and spitting out “jokes” about Siri and Herman Cain. So is the show set in the present day? Is our heroine using the tale of Lysistrata for inspiration on how to fix the basketball team?  Or is this show really set in 411 BC and we are to believe that we are watching a different spin on Aristophanes’ characters? If it’s the latter, why are they making so many references to 2011 pop culture?

The same device is used (far more effectively) in Godspell, where they riff on Steve Jobs, Lindsay Lohan, and Donald Trump. At least in the case of that show, they establish early on that we are seeing a present day retelling of the parables and applying them to life in 2011. In Lysistrata Jones, the pop culture references do little to advance the story or prove a point. They just seem forced in to get cheap laughs for a script that isn’t that funny on its own.

Perhaps I would have better understood the context of the show if I could have understood anything that happened in the first 15 minutes. Sadly, I was left to my own devices as 3rd row center wasn’t good enough to hear anything due to the muddiest sound mix ever. Shouldn’t this be fixed after 8 days of previews?? Liz Mikel, as the one-woman Greek chorus, Hetaira, was nearly inaudible as she raps through the opening number of the show.

If Mr. Beane, who successfully punched up the Sister Act book after its West End run, fails to work any magic with this script, the songs aren’t helping either. Almost every number in the first act of Lewis Flinn’s score sounds like that “Getcha Head In The Game” song from High School Musical. At one point, a character actually sung the lyric “What’s The Word? Tweety Bird”, which is just flat-out indefensible. The only two musical highlight’s are Lysistrata’s act one ballad “Where Am I Now?”, and the show’s closing number “Give It Up”, which is quite catchy. The rest of the songs are pedestrian, at best.

There are many instances over the last few seasons where great, veteran, stage actors, can lift up bad material. For instance, for all of it’s problems, I was able to still enjoy The Addams Family, due mostly to the work of Nathan Lane and Carolee Carmello. Brian D’arcy James and Sutton Foster made Shrek the Musical far more watchable in New York than it was with a less seasoned touring cast. Unfortunately, Lysistrata Jones does not have this luxury. Patti Murin, as the title character, has a nice voice and a perky personality, but she doesn’t have the star power to carry the show on her back. Josh Segerra, who has no Broadway resume to speak of, is a hard bodied, uninteresting, piece of wood as basketball captain, Mick. Lindsay Nicole Chambers, despite being a more capable performer, looks ten years older than the rest of the cast, making her the Lyssie Jones equivalent of Gabrielle Carteris in 90210.  The only cast member that shines in their role is Ms. Mikel, who doubles as the narrator and madam of the local brothel. She gets the most consistent laughs quite honestly deserves to be in a better show than this.

At the end of the day, “Lyssie Jones” will go down as the single worst show I’ve ever seen in New York. I have no problem with fluff pieces, as long as they are done well. I continue to be closet fans of Xanadu and Legally Blonde. Lysistrata Jones lacks the charm and fun of both of those shows. It’s the first time I have ever paid full price for a Broadway show and wanted to leave during the second act. While the reviews for the off-off Broadway version of this show were favorable, perhaps it would have made more sense to move the production to an Off-Broadway venue like New World Stages, because it’s not a show that is a fit for a 1000 seat house.

I will set the over/under for a closing date at January 3rd and take the under.

 
12 Comments

Posted by on 11/28/2011 in Broadway, Preview, Theatre Review

 

Tags: , , , ,

Theatre Review: “The Mountaintop” @ Bernard Jacobs Theatre, 11/22/11

Katori Hall’s The Mountaintop, is the Broadway transfer of a show that was enormously successful in Britain, winning that country’s Olivier award for “Best New Play” in 2010. American critics have been far more harsh in their treatment of Hall’s fictionalized account of Martin Luther King Jr’s final night before his assassination, and although I can see where they are coming from, I would disagree.

In order to buy into what Hall is selling, there are a couple of things you need to keep in mind when you walk in the theatre.

1. The play isn’t shedding new light on the Civil rights movement.

2. The play isn’t really telling us anything that hasn’t been said about MLK. In fact, the depiction of the human side of Dr. King, as a man who chain smokes, drinks, womanizes, and has really smelly feet, might be a problem for American audiences, who are more inclined to feel a sense of ownership over King’s legacy than the Brits.

3. The play isn’t really making any big statements about present day race relations.

In essence, “The Mountaintop” is like MLK “fan fiction”, and if you can follow Hall on a giant leap of faith through a plot twist that requires a certain suspension of disbelief, you will enjoy the show. I won’t giveaway the plot twist on this blog, although the info is certainly out there if you google search it (or you can tweet @djdan1079).

The two person show is set in a run down Memphis Motel, where King (a more subtle than expected Samuel L. Jackson) is in town to help settle a sanitation worker strike, and is in the midst of preparing a sermon on why America “is going to hell”. While waiting for a colleague to bring back a pack of Pall Mall’s, King meets a hotel maid named Camae (Angela Bassett). She arrives at his room to deliver coffee, but it’s obvious that King is looking for reasons to keep her there. The two seem to find an instant chemistry and the next 40 minutes shows the two in a flirty, sometimes foul-mouthed exchange, on a variety of topics, including family, race relations, the proper way to smoke, violent versus nonviolent protests, Malcom X, Jesse Jackson, and more. The banter is more suited to a sitcom than to a MLK play, but it works largely due to Bassett’s impeccable comic timing.

And that’s when we get to the plot twist.

It is at that moment, an hour into this one-act show, that the audience might feel like they have hopped aboard the “WTF Express”. The show takes a turn for the metaphysical, and it starts to get weird. Dr. King and Camae are engaged in a pillow fight straight out of the slumber party scene in Grease. We even learn that God is actually a black woman with spotty cell phone coverage. But if you can follow Ms Hall’s journey through a choppy 15 minutes, the payoff on the backend is breathtaking. David Gallo’s motel room set literally blows apart before your eyes into a film projection documenting the last 50 years of black American history. Bassett narrates with a spectacular slam poetry monologue set to original music by Branford Marsalis. It is a sequence that you would more expect to see in a $14 million dollar Broadway musical, but it doesn’t feel at all out-of-place in this production. After it’s completion, Jackson delivers one final, stirring monologue that brings the show to a satisfying close.

As MLK, Jackson brings a natural energy to the character, giving us more of a sense of the “man” rather than the “preacher”. However, he is completely overshadowed by Ms. Bassett, who gives as fine of a performance as I’ve ever seen on any stage in my lifetime. It’s almost hard to believe that this role was originally set to be played by Halle Berry. While she might have been a bigger box office name, I can’t imagine that she would have brought the same ferocity to the role.

The Mountaintop might not be a perfect play, but it’s a show that needs to be seen. The engagement has been extended through late January, with talk of possibly extending again with a new cast thereafter.

Grade: A-

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on 11/25/2011 in Broadway, Theatre Review

 

Tags: , , , ,

Theatre Review: Godspell @ Circle In The Square – 11/19/11

Written by: Dan Mason


SPOILER ALERT (For Dummies) – Jesus gets crucified in the second act of Godspell. I don’t think I’m giving too much away by telling you that the last image the audience sees is that of Christ’s followers carrying his body away towards the great, white, light. Interestingly enough, that image is the perfect metaphor for this revival of the Stephen Schwartz musical at Circle in the Square.

If I told you that Jesus was the least charismatic performer in the show, you would automatically assume that the show itself is certain to be nailed to the cross. However, through the benefit of a talented and extraordinarily energetic ensemble, combined with clever, fast paced,direction by Daniel Goldstein, you can’t help but smile through all 2 hours and 15 minutes of the show.

Theatre snobs are likely to scoff at the cutesy, tongue in cheek, pop culture references that permeate the production. Everything from Lindsay Lohan, to Steve Jobs, to Occupy Wall Street, to LMFAO’s song “Shots” are integrated into the retelling of the parables. But Godspell has never been a show intended to challenge the audience or its beliefs in Christianity. This is lighthearted, family fare, designed to appeal less to Ben Brantley, and more to the masses who remember performing the show in high school.

As Jesus, Hunter Parrish (Spring Awakening, Showtime’s Weeds), is arguably the weakest link in the cast. Despite possessing boyband good looks and the whitest teeth you have ever seen, his vocals in the first act on songs like “Save The People” and “All for the Best” sounded thin, and his presence is almost too goofy to be believable as a leader of men. Parrish is a talented actor though, and shines much more in the second act, when the stakes are raised and Christ comes to terms with his impending demise.

Doubling in the roles of John and Judas, Wallace Smith (American Idiot, The Lion King, Hair) boasts the longest Broadway resume in the cast, and it shows. He is the most polished performer on the stage. A recent blog in the NY Post suggested that producers missed the boat by not casting Smith as Jesus, and I would be hard pressed to argue that point. Although Parrish has more of a commercial name from his TV work, and ultimately, this show will need some crossover celebrities to maintain ticket sales. Other standouts in this production include Uzo Aduba (Coram Boy), who is breathtaking as the prostitute that Jesus saves from stoning, but also generates huge laughs with a hysterical Donald Trump impersonation. Aduba is hard to keep your eyes off of when she is onstage, which led to a post show discussion between my fiance and I as to whether you could cast a charismatic woman as Jesus as the run goes on. Hannah Montana’s Anna Maria Perez De Tagle sounds beautiful on “Day by Day”, and Telly Leung (Rent, Glee) kills it on “All Good Gifts”.

The show takes advantage of the intimate space of Circle In The Square, placing the orchestra throughout the house and routinely bringing audience members onstage to participate in the fun, including an intermission jam session where you can join the cast onstage to partake in the drinking of “wine” (it’s really grape juice). Michael  Holland’s orchestrations breathe new life into Schwartz’s score. Goldstein’s direction is fun, yet tasteful in its handling of the crucifixion.

Grade – B+

 
2 Comments

Posted by on 11/22/2011 in Broadway, Theatre Review

 

Tags: , , , ,

Thoughts about “On a Clear Day You Can See Forever” Preview – 11/19/11

Written by: Dan Mason

It’s not unheard of for Broadway producers to gamble on reviving a dated piece of material and using it as a star vehicle for Broadway royalty. Just last season Kristin Chenowith packed houses at the Broadway Theater for the critically panned, but commercially successful Promises, Promises. Given the fact that the show recouped a sizeable investment, it seemed like an intelligent risk to team Harry Connick Jr (The Pajama Game) with Michael Mayer (Spring Awakening, American Idiot) and let them take a crack at the 1965 flop, On a Clear Day, a show largely praised for its score, and crucified for a book about reincarnation, ESP, and other psycho-babble nonsense.

Mayer has completely re-conceived the show, taking the original story about an eccentric young woman, who was an English aristocrat in a past life, and turning it into a story of a young, gay, florist, who was formerly a female jazz singer. David Turner (Arcadia) plays David Gamble,  the love interest for Connick’s recently widowed psychoanalyst, Dr. Mark Bruckner. Except he’s not really the love interest, because middle-aged females aren’t paying to see their beloved Harry Connick romancing a man on stage. So the real love interest is the jazz singer, alter-ego, Melinda Wells (Jessie Mueller in her Broadway debut).

Confused yet? Because that love triangle is only part of what’s going on in this cluttered mess. Drew Gehling (Jersey Boys) is David’s badly treated boyfriend, Warren. Kerry O’ Malley (Into The Woods, White Christmas) is completely wooden and uninteresting as a medical colleague who is secretly in love with Dr Bruckner.

There are many different things happening in Clear Day, and the problem is that it’s hard for the audience to feel emotionally invested in any of it. The notion that Dr. Bruckner could be in love with a jazz singer who died 30 years before is completely implausible and hard to buy into. Yet, you don’t believe for a second that the doctor has a true romantic interest in David Gamble. In fact, Bruckner comes across as largely uncaring about his patient, using him only to gain more knowledge about a dead jazz singer. The only character that elicits any sympathy through the first two and a half hours is David Gamble’s long-suffering boyfriend Warren, but he gets treated so badly that you just wish he would run off and find someone new who actually appreciates him.

All that being said, there is one genuinely beautiful scene in the last 15 minutes, where the show exquisitely explores the one relationship that is compelling. That is when Dr. Bruckner confronts the idea of death and tries to find closure over the death of his wife. It’s a powerful scene, and one of the few moments in the show where Connick appears emotionally connected to anything happening onstage. Unfortunately, the payoff still doesn’t justify the stupidity of the previous two and a half hours, where we are treated to ridiculous dialogue about reincarnation, ESP, and even a song asking whether it’s possible for one to learn of “pre-incarnation” and know what their next life will be.

The pacing of the show is something that needs to be addressed as previews continue. The first act checks in at 80 minutes, but feels like two hours. The second act does move along better, although the songs that feature Dr. Bruckner’s students could be cut completely, as they serve no purpose to the show at all. The set design is an eyesore, using a black and white, checkered, opt art look that gives way to bright, vivid colors, that may be appropriate for the 1970′s era, but stand in stark contrast to a show that is not “bright” at all.

The audience reaction from the Connick fan base that I spoke with at intermission seemed to be mixed, with some women just excited to see him onstage, and others who found the story to be ridiculous. One couple sitting next to us left at intermission and never returned. It will be interesting to see whether Connick’s name alone can get this show through it’s run. It will likely have to because I think the script problems are too great to be fixed in previews.

 
10 Comments

Posted by on 11/21/2011 in Broadway, Theatre Review

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Theatre Review: “Follies” @ Marquis Theatre, 10/06/11

At this point, it’s impossible to not have heard or read about the rave reviews of recent revival of Sondheim’s Follies, directed by Eric Schaeffer. The New York Times calls it, “vibrant“ and Time Out New York says, “…this is a show no grown-up should miss”.  It’s a masterpiece of a production. The cast, the orchestrations, and design are all stellar. Currently, it’s playing as a limited engagement and it’s breaking box-office records at the Marquis Theatre. I can’t argue with numbers and the general reaction that everyone has had with the production, but I can say that I walked away not caring as much as I probably should have.

I think the main error was the fact that I wasn’t able to connect to the material as quickly as I needed to. It took me until, “Who’s That Woman”, sung by the unbelievable, effortless Terri White, to actually feel something for the characters. The lack of emphasis of the younger characters at the beginning of the show created a sense that this musical is only for old people. (Obviously, that changed in the 2nd Act, but it was hard to digest at the beginning.)

Jan Maxwell in "Follies". Photo by Joan Marcus

As the characters started to unfold, the raw emotions were easily relatable to at any age. Jan Maxwell (Phyllis Roger Stone) was a triumph in her song, “Could I Leave You?”. It was an absolute triumph (worthy of an instant Tony nomination). Ron Raines (Benjamin Stone), Maxwell’s onstage husband, was equally as impressive with his rich baritone voice that made his solo, “The Road You Didn’t Take” sound like honey. The two of them had an uncanny stage relationship that was deeply moving.

My other main hang-up I had was Bernadette Peters (Sally Durant) and Danny Burstein’s (Buddy Plummer) relationship. I just didn’t get it. Peters’ vocals were filled with her classic “character” charm, except I felt it didn’t fit Durant’s character. (Granted, she could have been tired because the cast had spent the beginning part of the week in the recording studio creating the cast recording. I honestly think that Peters’ voice was tired and worn-down.) Peters’ two main songs, “In Buddy’s Eyes” and “Losing My Mind” were completely lackluster. I felt Burstein was making up for this issue and was working too hard throughout the entire show. Since I never really believed their relationship, I wasn’t heartbroken for either, nor was I happy when they walked off the stage together. Durant was a psychotic emotional drunk, with little redeeming qualities. Do I dare say that the musical theatre legend, Bernadette Peters, was miscast? I feel blasphemous and shameful even questioning my allegiance to Ms. Peters. It was after all my first time seeing Ms. Peters live.

Photo by: Sara Krulwich - The New York Times

Sondheim’s beautiful lush score and witty lyrics is where the true masterpiece lies in this piece. The orchestra, directed by James Moore, was remarkable. I’m very excited that I will be able to relive the score with the new cast recording. (Hopefully, Ms. Peters performance will “read” different on the recording.)

It was also an honor to see Ms. Elaine Paige (Carlotta) perform. Her rendition of “I’m Still Here” was stunning – funny, heartfelt, engaging and deeply emotional.

Overall, I was very impressed with the production qualities and performances of Follies but I needed to connect on a different level to really “love” the show as so many others have already have. Whether or not that was the director, Eric Schaeffer’s, fault or my own, I still left thinking that it missed the opportunity to be sensational. Fantastic, yes, but it never reached sensational for me.

 
 

Tags: , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 87 other followers